Look at these examples of Le Futur Proche dans le Passé, or how to say 'was/were going to' :

J'allais fermer la porte quand tu m'as appelé.
I was going to close the door when you called me.

Tu allais manquer ton avion, c'est pour ça que tu t'es dépêché.
You were going to miss your plane, that's why you rushed.

Elle allait appeler la police !
She was going to call the police!

Allions-nous y arriver ? Personne ne le savait.
Were we going to make it? No one knew.

Vous alliez vous rejoindre plus tard.
You were going to meet later.

Oh là là ! Qu'est-ce qu'ils allaient s'ennuyer !
My oh my! They were going to get so bored!

Note that to express 'I was going to + verb', you use l'Imparfait of the verb aller in French, followed by the infinitive.

ATTENTION:
Using Le Passé Composé would mean 'I went to do'!
e.g. Je suis allé faire mes devoirs. (I went to do my homework.)

See also the previous lesson Aller + infinitive = to be going to (Le Futur Proche)

Learn more about these related French grammar topics

Examples and resources

Elle allait appeler la police !
She was going to call the police!

Oh là là ! Qu'est-ce qu'ils allaient s'ennuyer !
My oh my! They were going to get so bored!

J'allais fermer la porte quand tu m'as appelé.
I was going to close the door when you called me.

Vous alliez vous rejoindre plus tard.
You were going to meet later.

Allions-nous y arriver ? Personne ne le savait.
Were we going to make it? No one knew.

Tu allais manquer ton avion, c'est pour ça que tu t'es dépêché.
You were going to miss your plane, that's why you rushed.

Q&A Forum 9 questions, 19 answers

ShefaliA2Kwiziq community member

Which tense is this?

I read this phrase somwhere: <> also the same tense (i.e. futur proche dans le passé?

What confuses me here is that this translates in English literally as: "This week, the museum announced that the art was going to be restored from next February." But that's absurd because then we have a nuance of the past (the museum announced; art was going to be restored) as well as future (from next February).

Wouldn't the simple futur proche tense suffice here since we are talking about the future?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Asked 8 months ago

Like0Answer6

CécileKwiziq team memberCorrect answer

Hi Shefali,

Alan is indeed correct , it is because of reported speech -

The museum says :

"L' art va être restauré à partir de février prochain"

In reported speech or indirect speech -

"Le musée a annoncé que l'art allait être restauré à partir de février prochain"

In reported speech the main changes in tenses are:

Présent ----> Imparfait

Passé composé -----> Plus-que-parfait

Imparfait ----> Imparfait (no change)

Plus-que-parfait———> Plus-que-parfait (no change)

Futur ----> Conditionnel

Futur antérieur———-> Conditionnel passé (rare)

Conditionnel Présent ----> Conditionnel présent (no change)

Conditionnel passé ———-> Conditionnel passé (no change)

We are working on a lesson at this very moment ...

Like08 months ago

ShefaliA2Kwiziq community member

The phrase got omitted due to some reason. I'll re-paste it here:

"Cette semaine, le museé a anoncé que l'art allait être restauré à partir de février prochain."

Like08 months ago

AlanC1 Kwiziq Q&A super contributor

This is an interesting question, and I hope we get an answer from one of the native speaker experts.

It's a question of reported speech, where the tense is normally changed ("backshifted") from the original speech when it gets reported. So typically the museum spokesman says "The art will be restored" and this gets reported as "He said that the art was going to be restored".

This backshift is characteristic of reported speech in both French and English. But, at least in English, it doesn't always happen. The backshift is optional if you know that the statement is still true (i.e. still in the future in this case) when you report it.

In this case we're told it's from next February, so it must still be in the future. Therefore in English we'd probably say "This week, the museum announced that the art will be restored from next February."

If, instead, you said "This week, the museum announced that the art was going to be restored from next February." it might imply that it's no longer true - e.g. the museum has had to cancel it's plan for lack of funding.

I'd be interested to know whether this is also true in French.

Like08 months ago

ShefaliA2Kwiziq community member

Mille mercis, Alan! :) What you're saying is making sense to me. I'm going with this explanation until a native expert contests it.

Like08 months ago

AlanC1 Kwiziq Q&A super contributor

In English, we have essentially the same basic rules about changes in tense, but there a lot of exceptions. To achieve native speaker fluency in English, you have to go beyond those basic rules.

In general, reported speech seems to be similar in French and English, but I imagine there must be some differences. Perhaps we are more flexible in deciding whether to backshift in English? I hope the coming lesson will discuss these differences.

Like08 months ago

ShefaliA2Kwiziq community member

Merci, Cécile! It's a lot more clearer now. Looking forward to the lesson on Reported Speech.

Like07 months ago

Shefali asked:View original

Which tense is this?

I read this phrase somwhere: <> also the same tense (i.e. futur proche dans le passé?

Wouldn't the simple futur proche tense suffice here since we are talking about the future?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Don't have an account yet? Join today

BelindaB1Kwiziq community member

I thought that the 'imparfait' was used for showing a past habit as well i.e I used to..... as well as; I was .... so 2 correct answers?

Asked 1 year ago

Like0Answer1

BelindaB1Kwiziq community member

Not to worry! I've realised my error as the sentence was: J'allais manquer.... ( I was going to miss.... ) vs Je manquais.... ( which could mean: I was missing.... or I used to miss..... and so the former sentence was correct.

Like01 year ago

Belinda asked:View original

I thought that the 'imparfait' was used for showing a past habit as well i.e I used to..... as well as; I was .... so 2 correct answers?

Don't have an account yet? Join today

JonathanC1Kwiziq community member

Does this indicate failure?

In English, when we say “I was going to...”, it implies that we intended to do something but didn’t. Is the same true in French? Or, for example, could I say « J’allais ouvrir la fenêtre quand j’ai entendu un crie horrible. Je suis sorti par la fenêtre tout suite ! »

Asked 1 year ago

Like0Answer3

CécileKwiziq team memberCorrect answer

Hi Jonathan,

Indeed it is exactly the same meaning in French, You were going to do something and something prevented you from doing it...

J'allais sortir promener mes chiens quand j'ai réalisé qu'il pleuvait = I was going to go and walk my dogs when I realised it was raining

Hope this helps!

Like01 year ago

BillC1Kwiziq Q&A regular contributor

Bonjour. I’m curious, based on this reply, what’s the best way to say:

“i was going to the market when..”?

would that also be “j’allais au marché quand...

or would a different construction be better such as:

j’étais en train d’aller au marché quand...

Like010 months ago

CécileKwiziq team member

Hi Bill,

"J'allais au marché quand ...." is correct for "I was going to the market when..."

The use of the imperfect already conveys the duration required for that meaning.

Like010 months ago

Jonathan asked:View original

Does this indicate failure?

Don't have an account yet? Join today

BarbaraC1Kwiziq community member

Une phrase avec "Si/if" ... l'imparfait/le conditionnel

Stephane ...(allait) rater son rendez-vous s'il ne se dépêchait pas. Est-ce qu'on peut dire plus correctement -Stephane raterait son rendez-vous s'il ne se dépêchait pas? Est-ce que j'ai raison? Expliquez -le-moi, s'il vous plaît.

Asked 1 year ago

Like0Answer2

ChrisC1 Kwiziq Q&A super contributor Correct answer

Your sentence is also correct but has a slightly different meaning.

Stephane was going to miss his meeting if he didn't hurry. -- Stephane allait rater son rendez-vous s'il ne se dépêchait pas

Stephane would missed his meeting if he didn't hurry. -- Stephane raterait son rendez-vous s'il ne se dépechait pas.

-- Chris (not a native speaker).

Like01 year ago

ChrisC1 Kwiziq Q&A super contributor

Sorry, I made a typo in the second example:

Stephane would miss his meeting, ....

-- Chris.

Like01 year ago

Barbara asked:View original

Une phrase avec "Si/if" ... l'imparfait/le conditionnel

Don't have an account yet? Join today

BarbaraC1Kwiziq community member

La question sur l'examen était Stephane ... (allait)

Asked 1 year ago

Like0Answer1

ChrisC1 Kwiziq Q&A super contributor

Please repost your question here. -- Chris.

Like01 year ago

Barbara asked:View original

La question sur l'examen était Stephane ... (allait)

Don't have an account yet? Join today

TamaniA2Kwiziq Q&A regular contributor

Quand tu m'as appelé

Should it not be "quand tu m'es appélé?

Asked 2 years ago

Like0Answer1

RonC1 Kwiziq Q&A super contributor Correct answer

Bonsoir Tamani,

No, in this case, «m'as appelé» is the correct syntax, the reason being that it is NOT a reflexive verb. Instead «m' = me» functions as a direct object pronoun, who were you going to call --> me.
If, on the other hand, you were telling someone your name, one would say Je m'appelle . . . or Il s'est appelé . . .--> he called himself. . . or more correctly «he is named».
It is very easy to confuse the use of direct object pronouns with the reflexive verbs; however, this is something that you will learn with time.

J'espère que ma réponse vous aidera.
Bonne chance et bonne continuation dans vos études en français, la langue de Molière et qui a été utilisé par le monde depuis l’époque d’Hugues Capet

Like02 years ago

Tamani asked:View original

Quand tu m'as appelé

Should it not be "quand tu m'es appélé?

Don't have an account yet? Join today

DzoanB1Kwiziq community member

Qu'est-ce qu'ils allaient s'ennuyer

Qu'est-ce qu'ils allaient s'ennuyer is not a question? Do you have a lesson on that? Thank you.

Asked 2 years ago

Like0Answer1

AurélieKwiziq team memberCorrect answer

Bonjour Dzoan !

We don't have a lesson on this yet, but here's an explanation :)

Qu'est-ce que or Comme can both be used to introduce exclamative sentences such as "How bored were they going to get!" or "How nice are you!":
Comme tu es gentil!
Qu'est-ce que tu es gentil!

Here's a link to a related lesson on how to express exclamations with "What a...!":
https://progress.lawlessfrench.com/revision/grammar/how-to-express-what-a-with-quel-quelle-quels-quelles

À bientôt !

Like02 years ago

Dzoan asked:View original

Qu'est-ce qu'ils allaient s'ennuyer

Qu'est-ce qu'ils allaient s'ennuyer is not a question? Do you have a lesson on that? Thank you.

Don't have an account yet? Join today

EllenC1Kwiziq community member

How would you write "We used to go to the cafeteria"?

That was the answer I chose and I am curious as to why it is wrong.

Asked 2 years ago

Like0Answer3

NicholasC1Kwiziq Q&A regular contributor

Nous allions à la cafétéria. It's the imparfait when you "used to"do something.

Like02 years ago

EllenC1Kwiziq community member

OK thanks.

Like02 years ago

ChrisC1 Kwiziq Q&A super contributor

"We used to go to the cafeteria." is a general statement about the past and therefore translated using the imparfait: "Nous allions à la cafétéria." However, the exercise seems to be about something else (Le futur proche in the past). If you wanted to say "We were going to go to the cafeteria." you would translate this as "Nous allions aller à la cafétéria." -- Chris.

Like02 years ago

Ellen asked:View original