French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,011 questions • 30,312 answers • 876,274 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,011 questions • 30,312 answers • 876,274 learners
What is wrong with tu es Anglaise instead of tu es anglaise
Nous aurions pu choisir un grand chat ou pas?
je viens de Riga!
-if I want to say we are from Riga ,it is:........
I do not understand why hope is not expressed in the subjunctive - "J'espère que la circulation ne sera pas trop mauvaise." What is the difference between "espèrer" et "penser" when using the subjunctive?
By the way, "J'en ai pour cinq minutes maximum" is the type of little idiomatic phrase that I talk about as necessary to really speak French. It doesn't really translate verbatim, but it's a common phrase you have to understand. Thanks.
Why the 'le'?
Hi Chris,
WOW! I never knew there was an option when using vous. Figured since the vous (subject pronoun) imposed the plural second person it would ALSO impose the plural past participle. Is it grammatically wrong to use 'retournes' in this case... even though you are only using the vous form for politeness. In other words wouldn't you be allowed a pass based on grammar.
My apologies for having multiple questions on this lesson. It is not that the lesson is unclear. It is that the two test questions that test the understanding of the lesson are awkward if not downright counter productive to reinforcing the lesson.
For example: the lesson states that when 'avoir + descendu' is used with an animated being as the object then it means to kill/shoot that being. Unless the test question really means that Jack took the giant's dead body(and hence no longer animated (LOL) ) downstairs then it is misleading and confusing. In English "to take someone downstairs" simply means to usher them to your basement.
Why is the answer not: Georges cherche pour son neuf stylo?
There is no suggestion that the new pen has been used before. If it had, it would be (masc/sing) nouveau - the answer given as correct.
Can you please explain why the answer is nouveau.
Hi, I was doing a writing exercise translating "So that all was ready on time." The correct answer was "Pour que tout soit prêt à temps,"' and not "'Pour que tout soit prêt à l'heure." Why is it better to use à temps in this sentence?
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level