You've seen that in compound tenses, such as Le Passé Composé, the majority of verbs use avoir as auxiliary. See for example Conjugate regular -er verbs (+ avoir) in Le Passé Composé (conversational past). For those verbs, the past participle remains unchanged.
However, it is different when it comes to verbs using être as the auxiliary in Le Passé Composé, such as the Conjugate coming and going verbs (+ être) in Le Passé Composé (conversational past), Conjugate mourir, naître, décéder, devenir, rester (+ être) in Le Passé Composé (conversational past) and Conjugate reflexive verbs (+être) in Le Passé Composé (conversational past).
Look at these verbs using être as auxiliary in Le Passé Composé:
Anthony est devenu boulanger.
Anthony became a baker.
Elle est retournée à la maison.
She went back home.
Les garçons sont revenus !
The boys are back!
Elles sont sorties hier.
They went out yesterday.
Alice s'est maquillée.
Alice put her make-up on.
Jules et Pierre se sont bien amusés le weekend dernier.
Jules and Pierre had fun last weekend.
Note that when être is used as the auxiliary in compound tenses such as Le Passé Composé, the past participle must always agree in gender and number with the subject of the verb.
The endings follow this pattern:
| Masculine | Feminine | |
| Singular | --- | -e |
| Plural | -s |
-es |
Note that when the group includes men AND women, you will always use the masculine-plural ending -s.
Here are some examples:
Gérard a dit: "Je suis allé en France l'année dernière."
Gérard said: "I went to France last year."
Pauline a dit: "Je suis allée en France l'année dernière."
Pauline said: "I went to France last year."
Marco et Paulo ont dit: "Nous sommes allés en France l'année dernière."
Marco and Paulo said: "We went to France last year."
Julia et Émilie ont dit: "Nous sommes allées en France l'année dernière."
Julia and Emilie said: "We went to France last year."
James et Lucy ont dit: "Nous sommes allés en France l'année dernière."
James and Lucy said: "We went to France last year."
ATTENTION: Case of agreement with vous
As you know, the French vous can be used to refer either to more than one person (plural you), or in a polite way to a single person (formal you).
In le Passé Composé of (+ être) verbs, the agreement will depend on which vous is being used:
- with the plural vous, the past participle will take -s or -es depending on the gender of the people in the group it refers to:
Louis et toi, Francis, vous êtes rencontrés il y a trois ans.
Louis and you, Francis, met three years ago.
Isabelle et toi, Marie, êtes parties en même temps.
Isabelle and you, Marie, left at the same time.
Mes sœurs et toi, Charles, êtes restés un peu plus longtemps.
My sisters and you, Charles, stayed a bit longer.
- with the formal/singular vous, the past participle will remain unchanged or take an -e depending on the gender of the person it refers to:
Monsieur Dupont, vous vous êtes trompé.
Mister Dupont, you were mistaken.
Mademoiselle Rose, vous êtes devenue une charmante jeune fille.
Miss Rose, you became a charming young lady.
Learn more about these related French grammar topics
Examples and resources
Louis et toi, Francis, vous êtes rencontrés il y a trois ans.
Louis and you, Francis, met three years ago.
Pauline a dit: "Je suis allée en France l'année dernière."
Pauline said: "I went to France last year."
Toutes les filles sont allées à Montpellier.
All the girls went to Montpellier.
Elles sont sorties hier.
They went out yesterday.
Marco et Paulo ont dit: "Nous sommes allés en France l'année dernière."
Marco and Paulo said: "We went to France last year."
Anthony est devenu boulanger.
Anthony became a baker.
Mademoiselle Rose, vous êtes devenue une charmante jeune fille.
Miss Rose, you became a charming young lady.
Isaac, tu t'es bien reposé ?
Isaac, did you rest well?
Jules et Pierre se sont bien amusés le weekend dernier.
Jules and Pierre had fun last weekend.
James et Lucy ont dit: "Nous sommes allés en France l'année dernière."
James and Lucy said: "We went to France last year."
Mes sœurs et toi, Charles, êtes restés un peu plus longtemps.
My sisters and you, Charles, stayed a bit longer.
Elle est retournée à la maison.
She went back home.
Monsieur Dupont, vous vous êtes trompé.
Mister Dupont, you were mistaken.
Gérard a dit: "Je suis allé en France l'année dernière."
Gérard said: "I went to France last year."
Isabelle et toi, Marie, êtes parties en même temps.
Isabelle and you, Marie, left at the same time.
Alice s'est maquillée.
Alice put her make-up on.
Les garçons sont revenus !
The boys are back!
Julia et Émilie ont dit: "Nous sommes allées en France l'année dernière."
Julia and Emilie said: "We went to France last year."
Tammy, pourquoi es-tu revenue ?
Tammy, why did you come back?
Q&A
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
13/11/18
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
13/11/18
Hi Bibian,
No, you won't use the article in French with jobs as explained in the following lesson:
https://progress.lawlessfrench.com/revision/grammar/dont-use-indefinite-articles-with-professions
unless you add an adjective',
Anthony est un excellent boulanger .
Hope this helps!
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
13/11/18
Chris
Kwiziq community member
30/09/18
They had great fun last weekend.
Would the meaning be the same without "great"?
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
30/09/18
Hi Walker,
The addition of 'bien' intensifies the fun element , the difference between a good time and a great time.
Hope this helps!
Walker
Kwiziq community member
30/09/18
Chris: Sorry, I should have quoted the English translation from the page. It does not utilise the word 'great'. It just says they 'had fun' which (to have fun) is the base meaning of s'amuser (no bien required).
However, I do understand after reading Cécile's explanation that this is about intensifying the 'fun' element of the meaning, much like the bien in "j'aime bien...," when referring to objects (not people) I suppose.
Many thanks to you both!
Walker
Kwiziq community member
30/09/18
Karen
Kwiziq community member
25/09/18
Chris
Kwiziq community member
14/08/18
Hi Martin,
There is no "mettre" in this sentence because the verb " se maquiller" already means "to put one's make-up on". You can't say "I made myself up" in English. (Well, you could, but it would mean something completely different).
-- Chris.
Martin
Kwiziq community member
14/08/18
Chris
Kwiziq community member
6/07/18
Hi Bill, I believe there's been a useful and detailed discussion already on this subject. You should be able to find it.
-- Chris.
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
7/07/18
Hi Bill,
If you scroll right down in that lesson, you will find answers to this question.
Bonne continuation!
Laura
Kwiziq language super star
9/07/18
Bonjour Bill,
There is agreement with reflexive verbs only when the reflexive pronoun is the direct object.
Nous nous sommes lavés. - We washed up. The reflexive pronoun nous is the direct object: we washed ourselves - the people doing the washing and being washed are the same.
But in nous nous sommes brossé les cheveux, the reflexive pronoun is actually the indirect object, because the direct object is les cheveux. While not grammatical, you can get a better sense of this by rewording the sentence: Nous sommes brossé les cheveux à nous. Since the direct object does not precede the verb, there is no agreement.
As this is a very tricky grammar point, Aurélie is going to address it in detail, either in this lesson or a separate one, but in the meantime you might find section 3 of this lesson helpful: Agreement with pronominal verbs
Rob
Kwiziq community member
16 June 2018
1 reply
Brossé not brossés
CAN YOU PLEASE PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION, asked a number of times already, why the masc plural is brossé rather than brossés?
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
18/06/18
Hi Rob,
If you look at the bottom of the lesson, there is a long explanation in answer to the same question posted by Gabrielle on the 28 April.
Let me know if you still don't get it ....
Gruff
Kwiziq language super star
18/05/18
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
30/04/18
Hi Gabrielle,
The agreement of past participles in the case of reflexive verbs is most interesting.
As they use the auxilliary verb 'être' in the perfect tense, they normally agree just as adjectives in gender and number.
This is always true of simple intransitive verbs like se coucher, s'appeler, se réveiller, s'arrêter, which don't have an object.
In the case of verbs like 'se casser.... quelque chose', 'se brosser...quelque chose', 'se laver ...quelque chose' etc. which in English translate literally and oddly to break /brush/wash (yourself ) something which clearly have an object then we apply the agreement rules of verbs using 'avoir' in the perfect tense, and the past participle will agree only if the object precedes the verb.
Here are a few examples which might help to illustrate the point:
Ils se sont lavé les mains,( They washed their hands) but ils se sont lavés à l'eau froide (They washed in cold water).
Elle s'est cassé une jambe (She broke a leg) but La jambe qu'elle s'est cassée aura du mal à guérir (The leg she broke will not heal well).
Elles se sont préparé une soupe (They have made (themselves) a soup) but la soupe qu'elles se sont préparée est délicieuse (The soup they made is delicious).
Nous nous sommes acheté une maison (We bought ourselves a house) but La maison que nous nous sommes achetée n'a pas de dépendances (The house we bought has no outbuildings)
Hope this helps!
Gabrielle
Kwiziq community member
30/04/18
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
30/04/18
Alan
Kwiziq community member
30/04/18
Cécile - could you explain this example more, I don't see the difference. Don't both cases have an object which doesn't precede the verb?
Ils se sont lavé les mains,( They washed their hands) but ils se sont lavés les mains à l'eau froide (They washed their hands in cold water).
Cécile
Kwiziq language super star
1/05/18
Hi Alan,
Thanks for pointing this out, it is in fact a mistake . The examples should read:
Ils se sont lavé les mains.
But
Ils se sont lavés à l'eau froide .
Will correct the text above.
Michael
Kwiziq community member
29 December 2018
1 reply
In the study plan test
I was presented with the following:
Nous ________ les cheveux.We brushed our hairHINT: Conjugate "se brosser" (to brush) using Le Passé ComposéMy answer was: Nous nous sommes brossés les cheveux.It was marked, Nearly Correct. Kwiziq gave the following as the correct answer: Nous nous sommes brossé les cheveux.I responded to the question by agreeing with number for 1st person plural, (nous + être=past participle + plural)Here is the text from the lesson:Note that when être is used as the auxiliary in compound tenses such as Le Passé Composé, the past participle must always agree in gender and number with the subject of the verb.Please explain why I was not graded as completely correct.Thank you.
Bill
Kwiziq community member
7 January 2019
7/01/19
The same thing just happened to me. Shouldn't the past participle always be plural with "nous"?