L'imparfait vs le passé composéFor this particular question,
Quand j'étais petit, ________ avec mes legos.When I was small, I played with my Lego.
Can I check why L'imparfait should be used? I understand that l'imparfait is used for repeated actions or habit in the past. However, the English translation doesn't seem to reflect that.
Within the context itself, I can argue that
1 - When I was young, I used to play with my Lego (as a habit) - Quand j'étais petit, je jouais avec mes legos.
2 - When I was young, I played with my Lego (one off event, which ended in the past) - Quand j'étais petit, j'ai joué avec mes legos.
Hence, I think both answers should be accepted, unless the English translation is changed in such a way that makes the action of "playing" repetitive.
Thanks lots
I got this question:
Cette pomme est bonne. - Oui, c'est _______.
I answered bon because I knew to use the masculine, but my question is why it's c'est in this case. I've read the relevant pages ("C'est" vs "Il/Elle est" to say it is/she is/he is in French and Standalone adjectives after c'est are always masculine) and my interpretation is that this would fall under 2b of "C'est" vs "Il/Elle est" to say it is/she is/he is in French:
il est/elle est for statements and opinions related to specific things.i answered the quizz with “of it” and “of him”. but “of him” was wrong , yet “of them” was correct
what is the difference between ”take care of him” vs “take care of them”. one is right, one is wrong but they both relate to ‘a person/people’ not things.
he takes care of him right away.
he takes care of them right away
he takes care of it right away
I translated "how many times" (I've got lost) as "combien de fois" rather than "le nombre de fois". This was not listed as an alternative, but according to my Reverso app they are both acceptable in this context. When would you use one rather than the other?
Can you please explain the difference between
Qui est ce qui
Qui est ce que
Quand j'étais petit, ________ avec mes legos.When I was small, I played with my Lego.
Can I check why L'imparfait should be used? I understand that l'imparfait is used for repeated actions or habit in the past. However, the English translation doesn't seem to reflect that.
Within the context itself, I can argue that
1 - When I was young, I used to play with my Lego (as a habit) - Quand j'étais petit, je jouais avec mes legos.
2 - When I was young, I played with my Lego (one off event, which ended in the past) - Quand j'étais petit, j'ai joué avec mes legos.
Hence, I think both answers should be accepted, unless the English translation is changed in such a way that makes the action of "playing" repetitive.Thanks lots
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level