C'est v il estIs it the case that both of these sentences are grammatically correct:
- Il est mon cousin -- as a statement about a specific person
- Qui est-ce? - C'est mon cousin -- as in, He + is + my [noun]
Or, equally:
- Elle est la présidente
- C'est la présidente
If they are both grammatically correct, can you explain the difference in meaning/usage between the two versions?
My guess: can I use the top version if we are having a conversation about Paul and I then explain that Paul is my cousin: "Paul te ressemble. - Oui, il est mon cousin."
or we are having a conversation about Sophie and I then comment that she is the class president: "Sophie a l'aire très confiante. - Oui, elle a gagné l'élection et elle est maintenant la présidente."
Whereas the bottom version applies if the identity of the person is unknown:
Who is that person? C'est mon cousin.
Who is Sophie? C'est la présidente de la société.
We are still talking about a specific person, but the person is previously unknown in the conversation.
Is this correct? Would you explain it another way?
HI there, long time fan, first time commenter.
I have no idea what 'that's it' is supposed to mean in this context? It isn't a phrase I would ever use unless used in the following scenarios:
"That's it! You've cracked the case." (When referring to a previous piece of information or clue or input).
"That's it. I've had enough."
"That's it. I've been looking for it everywhere" (here I would use 'that's the one' instead).
Could you please provide an alternative of what this is supposed to mean? As this translation feels awfully unnatural to me. Is this a specific phenomenon that can't really be translated or is situational? As I would never say "That's it. She finally got her results" in this way?
Why am I not putting an e at the end (a tenu and not a tenue if we're speaking of a féminine thing)?
Hi, should “En effet, ils permettent de se confronter à des situations inattendues et parfois déstabilisantes, ce qui nous oblige à nous adapter à des réalités complètement différentes.” be “En effet, ils permettent de se confronter à des situations inattendues et parfois déstabilisantes, ce qui nous obligent à nous adapter à des réalités complètement différentes.” because it is the “situations” creating the “obliger”?
Hi, should “on m'avait expliqué que le départ du ferry était retardé” be “on m'avait expliquée que le départ du ferry était retardé” because “m’” is a female direct object (I.e. Emeline is speaking)?
Also, the spelling on “En dépit de tous mes efforts pour arriver à l'heure à la gare ferrovière” is not coming up in WordReference, only “ferroviaire” is. Which is correct please?
Brian
My dictionary gives appréhender, craindre, and redouter as translations for dread. Why are the first two not accepted ? Thanks.
C'est une femme qui parle ; c'est une verbe avec être : Pourquoi, donc, n'est-il pas "Je me suis également fixée...." ?
Is it the case that both of these sentences are grammatically correct:
- Il est mon cousin -- as a statement about a specific person
- Qui est-ce? - C'est mon cousin -- as in, He + is + my [noun]
Or, equally:
- Elle est la présidente
- C'est la présidente
If they are both grammatically correct, can you explain the difference in meaning/usage between the two versions?
My guess: can I use the top version if we are having a conversation about Paul and I then explain that Paul is my cousin: "Paul te ressemble. - Oui, il est mon cousin."
or we are having a conversation about Sophie and I then comment that she is the class president: "Sophie a l'aire très confiante. - Oui, elle a gagné l'élection et elle est maintenant la présidente."
Whereas the bottom version applies if the identity of the person is unknown:
Who is that person? C'est mon cousin.
Who is Sophie? C'est la présidente de la société.
We are still talking about a specific person, but the person is previously unknown in the conversation.
Is this correct? Would you explain it another way?
Pourquoi est-ce que de utilise dans cette phrase--de lui parler--et pas à? Parler à lui ou parler de lui?
Je ne comprends pas pourquoi on utilise [Noah] c'est un véritable expert. Pourquoi on n'utilise pas "il" ici?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level