Point of interest - Université Harvard or 'de Harvard' or 'd'Harvard' or some/all of the preceding ?The speaker clearly says "Université d'Harvard" but is this technically correct ? How would we know ?
Wikipedia refers to Université Harvard, and uses 'de Harvard' for lists of 'presidents of Harvard' etc.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universit%C3%A9_Harvard
Bab.la also shows 'de Harvard' for diplomas '(from )Harvard' etc and in a number of examples referring to Harvard University uses "Université de Harvard". https://en.bab.la/dictionary/english-french/harvard
Examples of all 3 are found on this page from linguee https://www.linguee.com/english-french/translation/harvard+university.html
The university is named after (Rev) John Harvard, so my first thought was that it would follow the same format as for instance "Institut Pasteur" and should just be Université Harvard, or at least be treated as h aspiré and be 'de Harvard'. Last on my list would have been d'Harvard. However it appears all are acceptable ?
Vous Pouvez poséz les questions de enregistrements pour tester ?
The speaker clearly says "Université d'Harvard" but is this technically correct ? How would we know ?
Wikipedia refers to Université Harvard, and uses 'de Harvard' for lists of 'presidents of Harvard' etc.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universit%C3%A9_Harvard
Bab.la also shows 'de Harvard' for diplomas '(from )Harvard' etc and in a number of examples referring to Harvard University uses "Université de Harvard". https://en.bab.la/dictionary/english-french/harvard
Examples of all 3 are found on this page from linguee https://www.linguee.com/english-french/translation/harvard+university.html
The university is named after (Rev) John Harvard, so my first thought was that it would follow the same format as for instance "Institut Pasteur" and should just be Université Harvard, or at least be treated as h aspiré and be 'de Harvard'. Last on my list would have been d'Harvard. However it appears all are acceptable ?
Could clouer and enfoncer be used interchangeably here or is there a subtle difference ?
Hi,
in one of the questions I was asked to conjugate épeler. I answered with épèle but apparently both épelle and épèle are correct. My partner is French and she didn't know why this is the case. Can someone explain why this verb follows the rules for both kinds of "-ELER" verbs?Thanks!
Ryan
Yes “finissait” is the right answer here, but the verb “terminer” is more appropriate here.
Yes “J’irais” is the right answer but, “J’irais bien” is also correct.
“Savoir la vérité” is not a proper turn of phrase; using the verb connaître is the correct way: “connaître la vérité”.
Vous pourrez également explorer la diversité culturelle des pays francophones en assistant notamment à nos rencontres littéraires, et en discuter les enjeux lors de nos conférences et débats d'idées.
In this sentence, I'm thinking that in English, there would be parallel construction between "en assistant" and "en discuter." We would say "in attending" and "discussing," but I'm noticing that in French, "discuter" is the infinitive form of the verb rather than the gerund (as in "assistant"). Are the verb forms that were chosen in French optional? And in French, is the lack of parallel construction perfectly acceptable? Could this sentence have also used:
both "en assistant" and "en discutant" as the verb forms
OR both "en assister" and "en discuter?"
Thanks for your thoughts on this!
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level