French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,039 questions • 32,604 answers • 1,028,283 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,039 questions • 32,604 answers • 1,028,283 learners
All three sample sentences for this usage seem freighted with disappointed expectations! Is this the way it’s normally used or just a coincidence?
My question concerns the imparfait conjugation of the verb 'exister' in the sentence:
Aussi, lorsque j'ai appris qu'il existait un musée qui...
I would like to know if conjugating here in the imparfait (existait) does not imply that the museum used to exist, but no longer does. I am inclined to want to conjugate 'exister' in present tense to get around this problem, yet I know its gramatically incorrect to do so. If someone can help, I would greatly appreciate.
Have a good day all :)
In the example with Merci de votre appel, is de votre a kind of shorthand or contraction of d’avoir appelé?
Pourquoi pas, "qui ne nous effraie/effraye pas du tout" ?
Hi,
Not related specifically to the direct subject of this lesson, but I'm interested in the grammar in the sentence "Vous comparaissez devant le tribunal pour conduite..." I would have used "pour conduire...". Is this covered in a lesson somewhere?
Thanks.
This phrasing is not how a native English speaker would say this. I think “ Nantes was France’s best city for cycling” would be clearer. As is, it sounds like the city rides bikes.
C'est possible de rendre la vidéo accessible aux États-Unis?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level