French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,866 questions • 32,286 answers • 1,002,112 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,866 questions • 32,286 answers • 1,002,112 learners
Hi, this struck me as odd: "vous devriez peut-être considérer que la relation n'est pas n'est pas censée durer" - why not just "n'est pas censée durer"? Why the repetition?
Would 'doué' have been as good as 'talentueux' here?
Which tense would lendemain be , as it can be used in both imparfait,future anterieur
I am a bit confused on the contexts you would use this, because it feels like a bit curt ? Would it be OK to use it for example, when you do a favor to someone that they want to repay, and you respond with this ? Or might it come across as a bit too aggressive ?
When I listen to the entire passage, I clearly hear the word elle in the last sentence. When I listen to the last sentence as given in the exercise, I hear what sounds like 'on' instead of elle. I don't have the best ears, but it is what I hear.
il raconte une histoire à mon ami- il lui en raconte (or it should be il la lui raconte"?) if it's 2d option, could you please explain why? thank you!
Qu'est-ce que c'est [chose]?, Qu'est-ce que c'est que + [something] , Qu'est-ce que + [chose] all mean the same thing and they have the same level of formality, right? Am I understanding this correctly?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level