"Exceptions" and "Attention" Lesson sections not covered by Kwiziq testsI have a notebook and I have added these two lessons.
Un/une become de/d' in negative sentences in French (French Indefinite Articles)
Du/de la/de l'/des all become de/d' in negative sentences (French Partitive Articles)
I went through several rounds of Kwiziq tests and I only get tested on the basic rules, never on the "ATTENTION" or "EXCEPTION" subsections of these lessons.
I got a score of 100%, but it feels like The app should also offer me test on these other topics.
How can I get more tests for these exceptions?
Example of rules I have never been offered any tests
This rule does NOT apply to sentences using the verb être and other List of French "state verbs" - "verbes d'état", with which the indefinite article doesn't change:
OR
When you want to emphasise the meaning of ONE (un/une) - not just a/an - as in He doesn't have ONE car, but TWO, you will keep un/une in the negative sentence - here it doesn't mean no/any:
"Moins le quart" is hardly perceptible.
Can someone help me with laissez-vous enchanter? What exactly does this mean in English? Let yourself be enchanted? It's easy to be enchanted? Thank you.
I have a notebook and I have added these two lessons.
Un/une become de/d' in negative sentences in French (French Indefinite Articles)
Du/de la/de l'/des all become de/d' in negative sentences (French Partitive Articles)
I went through several rounds of Kwiziq tests and I only get tested on the basic rules, never on the "ATTENTION" or "EXCEPTION" subsections of these lessons.
I got a score of 100%, but it feels like The app should also offer me test on these other topics.
How can I get more tests for these exceptions?
Example of rules I have never been offered any tests
This rule does NOT apply to sentences using the verb être and other List of French "state verbs" - "verbes d'état", with which the indefinite article doesn't change:
OR
When you want to emphasise the meaning of ONE (un/une) - not just a/an - as in He doesn't have ONE car, but TWO, you will keep un/une in the negative sentence - here it doesn't mean no/any:
Hello, I was doing the writing exercise, Catherine Ségurane: a local heroine, I came across this sentence:
If you look behind me, on the ancient wall of the city,
I put ancien after mur but the correct answer is:
Si vous regardez derrière moi, sur l'ancien mur de la cité
And no, there was no hint about that. I really don't understand why we use ancien before the noun in that case.
1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: saurez-vous retrouvez is translated as : "can you match" -- can you say a little about how savoir in the futur is used in this case?
“On vous appellera quand on arrive” would be considered an acceptable, if casual sentence, as opposed to “on vous appellera quand on arrivera” which is a bit clunky, no?
is this the same for all future tenses?
for example jouer - becomes je jouerai so you dont pronounce the e after this i either?
I was reading a short piece and came across this sentence. I understand everything up until peuvent recevoir. I know what it's suppose to mean however why after que, we use peuvent instead of saying
Il y a au moins trois labels de qualité que les communes français peuvent recevoir .
can you ever use 'depuis' without que, ot only if it relates to time... depuis ce matin, il pleut?
I wouldn't think that this is necessarily reflexive, not without context.
If we are talking about her teeth, for example, then yes it is reflexive; but what if she were brushing horses, for example, or perhaps her children's teeth? Would not "Elles les brosse." then be correct?
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level