Please helpI notice that my answers in this lesson might as well be random.
This lesson opens with the statement:
“In French, there are two different structures to express "reminding", depending on whether we mean to be reminded of [something] or to prompt someone to remember [to do something].”
Let’s call to be reminded of something ‘A’ and to prompt someone to remember ‘B’
The structure of A is:
“rappeler + person one's reminded of + à + person being reminded”
unless an object pronoun appears in the sentence. If there is, the structure of A becomes:
”me/te/lui/nous/vous/leur + rappeler + person one is reminded of"
So there are two different sentence structures for A.
When we want to prompt someone to remember (B), the structure is:
"rappeler + à + person being reminded + de+ [infinitif]”
unless an object pronoun appears in the sentence. If there is, the structure of B becomes:
“me/te/lui/nous/vous/leur + rappeler + de + [infinitif]”
Note this involves two different sentence structures in the case of B.
Each of these sentence structures differ, one from the others, so in fact there are four structures involved in French to express reminding.
As the lesson is presented, a student must retain these four only slightly different structures and identify where to use them in order to progress with this lesson.
Were the lesson split in two - using the A and B situations described above, the student would need to retain and identify only two structures at a time, leading to a better chance of succeeding in A before progressing to B.
I imagine this would lead to this lesson attracting less confusion and improved learning. Or am I missing something? Is there a logic or pattern that evades me?
If you want to say "I think about my wife". ChatGPT suggests I say "Je pense à elle", instead of "Je lui pense".
It says "Je lui pense" can be grammaticaly correct but it's too formal, old or used in literary.
However, this lesson says nothing about this. Can anyone explain this?
I notice that my answers in this lesson might as well be random.
This lesson opens with the statement:
“In French, there are two different structures to express "reminding", depending on whether we mean to be reminded of [something] or to prompt someone to remember [to do something].”
Let’s call to be reminded of something ‘A’ and to prompt someone to remember ‘B’
The structure of A is:
“rappeler + person one's reminded of + à + person being reminded”
unless an object pronoun appears in the sentence. If there is, the structure of A becomes:
”me/te/lui/nous/vous/leur + rappeler + person one is reminded of"
So there are two different sentence structures for A.
When we want to prompt someone to remember (B), the structure is:
"rappeler + à + person being reminded + de+ [infinitif]”
unless an object pronoun appears in the sentence. If there is, the structure of B becomes:
“me/te/lui/nous/vous/leur + rappeler + de + [infinitif]”
Note this involves two different sentence structures in the case of B.
Each of these sentence structures differ, one from the others, so in fact there are four structures involved in French to express reminding.
As the lesson is presented, a student must retain these four only slightly different structures and identify where to use them in order to progress with this lesson.
Were the lesson split in two - using the A and B situations described above, the student would need to retain and identify only two structures at a time, leading to a better chance of succeeding in A before progressing to B.
I imagine this would lead to this lesson attracting less confusion and improved learning. Or am I missing something? Is there a logic or pattern that evades me?
In the 'Fill-the-blanks' Kwiz 'Nos activites pendant les vacances', my answer: 'Les enfants essaieront la peche a pied avec un guide local' was marked wrong, with the correction provided of 'Les enfants essaierons ...' The correction Kwiziq shows is 1st person plural, but I thought that 'The kids will try shellfish gathering with a local guide' is 3rd person plural.
Au secours! Merci!
In the bottom half of the quick lesson it says:
"- the more elegant
Comment se fait-il que ... ?-> Note the use of inverted question form to emphasise the elegant structure."
Did you leave out 'cela' between 'Comment' and 'se fait-il'?
In the first sentence, "to go to work" is given as "pour aller travailler". I put "pour aller au travail", which was not provided as an alternative. I've seen the second approach used, so I'm wondering if it's considered wrong, or just not included in this exercise.
I tend to get tangled up with possessive "de" but wanted to query why the two capitalised nouns above take de l’ rather than d’? The dog is best friend of "Man" not "a man", and capitalising both nouns implies to me a generalisation or personification: despite that, they don’t seem to be treated as proper nouns in French.
The clue on the 2nd last screen is ' it = general statement ' but there is no 'it' in the sentence being translated, just 'I find that topic really interesting.'
The clue is misleading given the answers suggested, not unexpectedly, use ' ce sujet ' or ' ce thème ' .
On the following screen "I am going to buy it straight away. " In this case 'it' refers to a specific novel, so 'general statement' is not correct either.
I don't think the clue is helpful or necessary on either screen.
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level