French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,997 questions • 32,511 answers • 1,023,718 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,997 questions • 32,511 answers • 1,023,718 learners
I read this phrase somwhere: <> also the same tense (i.e. futur proche dans le passé?
What confuses me here is that this translates in English literally as: "This week, the museum announced that the art was going to be restored from next February." But that's absurd because then we have a nuance of the past (the museum announced; art was going to be restored) as well as future (from next February).
Wouldn't the simple futur proche tense suffice here since we are talking about the future?
Thanks in advance for your help!
This isn’t un question about verbs, mais comment can I continuer apprendre français without feeling bored ou retour à anglais?
I hope this est un/une appropriate question à ask
"I gave it to him yesterday"
I have seen it translated into French as both:1)"Je le lui ai donné hier." and 2) "Je lui ai donné hier."
Duolingo teaches the first translation above and it is also what is seen on some reliable French websites such as Lawless French. However I have also seen it translated as in number 2 and translators in particular seem to leave out the "le."
Is this just a quirk of the translators, is it a difference between written and spoken French, or is it acceptable to leave out the "le" in either spoken or written French? Any help would be appreciated.Andrew K. Greenfield, MDwhat is the meaning of "par où"? is it different when used relative pronouns or noun clause? I can'not undertand it???
Is enfants not plural so the objective pronoun is leurs? Leur would equal "un enfant"?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level