French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,677 questions • 31,799 answers • 963,856 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,677 questions • 31,799 answers • 963,856 learners
Paul should have left earlier is given as 'Paul aurait du partir plus tot'.
I could have learnt to swim is given as 'J'aurais pu apprendre a nager'
These are exactly the same constructions, therefore they can not both be correct.
(Apologies for the absence of diacritic marks)
This was a sentence in the lesson: Ce soir-là, quelque chose d'extraordinaire se produisit.
Why is it not "quelque chose extraordinaire"? Why is it "d'extraordinaire?"
Thanks for the explanation!
Are both of these sentences grammatically correct? I understand why 'ce qui' in the first sentence is correct, but not why 'ce que' would be correct in the second one. I would be grateful for an explanation.
Ce qui à un moment donné est le substrat, n’est pas chaud
Ce que le substrat est à un moment donné, n’est pas chaudAre the following 2 phrases both correct: Une aventure à laquelle elle ne pouvait pas résister .....and: une aventure qu'elle n'y pouvait pas résister?
Is it ne vend pas
Or
Ne vends pas
If it is venir de + infinitive, is it je viens de se réveiller ? Or je viens de me réveiller ?
According to a lesson, "tous" should be placed between the auxiliary verb and the past participle
How would you say "Which shoes are yours?"
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level