French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,063 questions • 32,764 answers • 1,044,476 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,063 questions • 32,764 answers • 1,044,476 learners
In this sentence - I can hear "impatient" - without the e.
I'm a little confused at the distinction between "beacoup de" and "de nombreux". I used "beacoup de" in an answer and got it wrong, but I believe it was grammatically correct. The answers in the Q&A help a little, but I think it would also help to have this mentioned in the lesson text.
Why there isn't liaison between ''et elle''? (Claire est assez petite et elle a le taint mat)
Maybe Vous haïssez la médiocrité as well
Strange, in the learn and discuss, they come out fine.
Is féerique a possibility in the last line?
Would one do liaison in this sentence?
Nous sommes troP Occupe's. (sorry I can make an accent)
The question is:We don't hate that she is therelà. Why is Nous ne haïssons qu'elle soit là.
Hello. I answered the following exercise question incorrectly, selecting en instead of dans.
Les enfants sont ________ le métro.
The children are on the subway.I recently read this guidance in a Quick Lesson and thought en would be the correct choice. Could both be considered correct?
When talking about travelling somewhere, you will use à for "individual" modes of transport (walking, bicycle, bike etc), and en for "group" modes of transport (bus, coach, car, subway, etc).
Thanks for the help!
Consider...
1. "Paul should have left earlier."
2. "Paul should have had to leave earlier."As I understand it, both these sentences would be translated as "Paul aurait dû partir plus tôt", even though, in English, there is a difference in meaning. Is there a better way to translate #2 to convey the meaning that Paul was compelled to leave?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level