French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,771 questions • 32,008 answers • 980,627 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,771 questions • 32,008 answers • 980,627 learners
How do I know which to use our of tenir and garder in any particular context, please?
Here depuis serves as an adverb? Can I use the present l'indicatif to construct the sentence? Thanks.
The passage in question is, "pour que votre repas soit un succès !" I couldn't hear the "pour" at all despite running the audio track several times.
Hello,
In this exercise, when I put a space before the exclamation point following '2011', it was marked as wrong. Is this an exception because the sentence ends in a number, or rather, should there always be a space before an exclamation point in French?
Thanks a lot.
why "que ... d'autre" but not "que d'autre" like "qui d'autre, quoi d'autre"? Thanks.
I was struggling because London is a place and usually you replace a place by y at the same time I recognized the "de" which triggers en
1. Is there any word called 'reprimande' in French denoting the same sense as reprimand in English.
2. Le pire était à l'école où l'on m'envoyait dans le bureau du directeur. In this sentence means they?
3. This sentence is difficult for me to understand: je m'étais calmé avant qu'il ne soit trop tard !
The first part of the sentence is in the plus-que-parfait tense, while the second part is in the subjonctif present tense. Since the past perfect tense is always used to describe a past action that took place before another past action, shouldn't the subjonctif passé here be more appropriate? The English sentence itself illustrates this fact: ... had calmed down ... was
Thank you! Overall, a difficult but good exercise to think about the complex constructions of the sentences.
I think there is a small mistake in the English text. Instead of 'The manager has just confirmed me that...' it has 'The manager had just confirmed me that...'
1. la pêche industrielle cause de graves dégâts aux écosystèmes marins.
2. les générations futures ne connaîtront jamais la riche biodiversité de nos océans.
In the above two sentences, is there any reason why riche and graves go before the nouns they qualify?
how do you ask. Who do they love? Qu'aiment-ils is WHAT do they love? but how would you ask WHO di they love?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level