French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,681 questions • 31,827 answers • 965,946 learners
I'll be right with you...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,681 questions • 31,827 answers • 965,946 learners
Is it just me or was the speaker going a bit fast for A2 level?
My apologies for having multiple questions on this lesson. It is not that the lesson is unclear. It is that the two test questions that test the understanding of the lesson are awkward if not downright counter productive to reinforcing the lesson.
For example: the lesson states that when 'avoir + descendu' is used with an animated being as the object then it means to kill/shoot that being. Unless the test question really means that Jack took the giant's dead body(and hence no longer animated (LOL) ) downstairs then it is misleading and confusing. In English "to take someone downstairs" simply means to usher them to your basement.
Hello, here : que j'ai toujours voulu voir. We do not have precise finished action, we do not have the dream that actually stopped in the past. We have either description/habit, or we have something in uncertain past/present. Why not imparfait? Thank you
Why "Comment appelle-te cet arbre" instead of Comment appelle-t-on cet arbre" for What do we call this tree?
Answer was rejected. Merci d'avance !
Why does one use allons gagner instead of gagnerons (future tense)? What determines which is better?
what is the reason that it is sometimes du or de not changed. i know it stays as de behind expreesions of quantity, befire plural adjectives befor nouns and after negative but have seen it elsewheere too and amgetting confused
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level