avoir besoin d'argentFirst issue:
Interaction p 23 : Tu as de l'argent pour faire les courses? Non, j'ai besoin d'argent.
It explains "avoir besoin de uses de alone when followed by a noun used in the partitive sense" which must be the rationale for the response above.
1. Why isn't the question also partitive sense? Please help me make the distinction.
Second issue:
On p340, it says that avoir besoin de is one of a small number of verbs (it also includes s'agir de, parler de, se souvenir de) that require "de" before a noun object and gives the example
"J'ai besoin d'argent pour voyager" (no article before "argent")
and also gives "Nous parlons du Canada en cours" (has the article); Il s'agit d'un voyage au Canada; On se souvient du passé là-bas.
2. For all those examples on p340 except avoir besoin de, there is an article and I don't know why they differ.
I am becoming confused. Can someone help please?
First issue:
Interaction p 23 : Tu as de l'argent pour faire les courses? Non, j'ai besoin d'argent.
It explains "avoir besoin de uses de alone when followed by a noun used in the partitive sense" which must be the rationale for the response above.
1. Why isn't the question also partitive sense? Please help me make the distinction.
Second issue:
On p340, it says that avoir besoin de is one of a small number of verbs (it also includes s'agir de, parler de, se souvenir de) that require "de" before a noun object and gives the example
"J'ai besoin d'argent pour voyager" (no article before "argent")
and also gives "Nous parlons du Canada en cours" (has the article); Il s'agit d'un voyage au Canada; On se souvient du passé là-bas.
2. For all those examples on p340 except avoir besoin de, there is an article and I don't know why they differ.
I am becoming confused. Can someone help please?
In this example: “une blonde comme le soleil fille” I said it was correct. But I think it means, in English, “a blonde like the sun girl”. If so would the correct answer have been “Une blonde comme la fille soleil” ? Thanks.
Please can you explain why you can say je n'ai rien dit à personne but not je n'ai jamais dit rien?
Hi,
I was wondering when using être or avoir in the sentence below does it determine like it does when you use it in the idiomatic expressions?
L'étudiant n'est pas en classe. Il Sera encore endormi.
The student is not in class. He is probably still asleep
Cause I don't see the aura used here so I was wondering if it's similar when we learn about the idiomatic expressions.
Thank you
Nicole
Is this wrong: "Qu'est ce que c'est qu'une baguette"
Would this sentence be correct?
Je me réveillé à huit du matin. Nous sommes allées du faire shopping. Lorsque je suis rentré. Je pratiqye Mon français et je regarde le télévision.
Je nettorai ma chambre demain. Aussi je parle à Mon copain. Sure le telephone. Aujourd'hui je Marche dans mon visions.
Merci pour votre aider
In this text, "Serviette" qppears to be a beach blanket, though"napkin" is my dictionary definition. Similarly, "Rayures" are "scratches", "Glaciere"
Bonjour,
I was doing this sentence and since there are two verbs croire and aller I know that you look at the second verb which is aller to determine whether to use peux or puisse and aller is Subjonctif so you use the puisse am I correct?
Maman, papa , croyez- vous que je_____ aller seule au concert samedi sour.
Can we not just use ''Elle est ma soeur'' and ''Il est le fils de Martha'' ?
Edit: Nevermind, I asked my French friend who told me that you specifically cannot say 'Il/elle est un/une/mon/ma etc'
This rule only applies to the pronouns 'Il' (he) and 'Elle' (she).
So I've answered my previous question, so No you cannot say ''Elle est ma soeur'' it has to be ''C'est ma soeur''
I felt like it wasn't explained very in the lesson! (sorry!) I hope anyone seeing this message finds this helpful.
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level