French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,022 questions • 32,569 answers • 1,025,729 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,022 questions • 32,569 answers • 1,025,729 learners
For the last sentence "je les ai vus descendre de leur voiture", I wanted to say "je les ai vus en descendant". Would my version basically mean "I saw them while I was getting out of the car"? Or can you use en descendant to refer to the aunt and uncle in this case? Thanks in advance.
Désormais is not given as an option. Is there a reason for that ?
I
In thé answers " batterais' in the final text 'battrais'
I'll be right there in English is actually the use of the future continuous tense, as is I'll be there in two seconds. I'll is a contraction of I WILL.
Not a good example for using the present tense in English.
English teacher speaking here.
"l'hombre de grands arbres" was my answer and it was wrong because I had omitted the "s" from des. Can anyone explain why in this case one should keept the "s" on des?
Let me know if this is correct: in the passé composé, the past participle agrees with the direct object? The answer was "Tu les as vues" - the direct object was feminine plural - thus the -es to the past participle "vu." I experimented with Google translate, and this seems to be the rule but I haven't found it on Progress with Lawless French, so I wanted to double check.
le courage de me jeter dans le vide!
elle a plus mangé que moi or elle a mangé plus que moi
Blandine a joué plus au tennis que toi. (is it valid?)
Blandine a joué au tennis plus que toi. (is it valid?)
Blandine a plus joué au tennis que toi. (is it valid?)
which ones of them are valid?
In the lesson it mentions 'the irregular root prenn-' but I think it is in fact regular. The present 3rd person indicative plural is Ils prennent and that leads to prenn- as the subjunctive stem. Isn't it only irregular in the 1st and 2nd person plural where the prenn- becomes pren- as in prenions and preniez?
in my gcse book the english - i wanted to buy some trousers but they didn't suit me is translated as
j'ai voulu acheté un pantalon mais il ne m'allait pas .
As this is a one off occasion why is the imperfect of aller used and not the perfect
thanks
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level