French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,064 questions • 32,723 answers • 1,040,886 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,064 questions • 32,723 answers • 1,040,886 learners
I don't think this is a case of misunderstood grammar, just a poorly phrased question. What I think the writer had in mind was that just George was speaking, and was referring to himself and someone else, but the other answers all imply one person speaking, unless two people were speaking at exactly the same time (unlikely!), e.g. "Georges and Fiona".
Anyone care to shed light on the matter before I report?
"Entrer" means "to enter" as opposed to "come in," the later being what was directed to translate.
So you would say "when andrew and dan enter the bar" ...not "when andrew and dan enter in the bar"
Thinking it's just another "extra word" thing that happens when translating English to French...
If it is venir de + infinitive, is it je viens de se réveiller ? Or je viens de me réveiller ?
In your first two examples I see: "soit du fromage, soit un dessert" and then "j'aimerais soit une tablette soit un nouveau portable." I've looked to no avail to find an explanation for the usage/non-usage of a comma in the two phrases. Could you please elucidate?
In several of your test question you have the verb of (had)plus the verb which understood to be plu perfect and not imparfait. Now please explain how you are going to differentiate?
why is the verb after qui "vient" and "fait"? I don't get that, sorry.
And how would I know to use other verbs the same way?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level