French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,061 questions • 32,715 answers • 1,040,109 learners
Clever stuff happening!
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,061 questions • 32,715 answers • 1,040,109 learners
We know that “on” has been explained to mean “one” (in general terms) just like in English, in which case in the sentence above it would mean “no one is allowed to park here, generally”. So I am confused by the fact that, the answer to the multiple choice questions did not include the above option as a valid answer :(
Why "m'a gâché la vie" and not "a gâché ma vie" or "m'est gâchée la vie".
This was a multiple choice question. The correct answer was given as "Tu leur rappelles de faire leur lit." Why isn't it "Tu leur rappelles de faire leurs lits." ?
The question was: "- Nous ?" "- Non, pas ________ !"
The correct response was "vous". Why is "toi" incorrect?
In sentence i had to take it with me you have used je devais le prendre avec moi but as per lesson we should have used passé composé because the sentence is i had to
Hey,
why is it "et elle détestait particulièrement être le centre de l'attention."
Collins Robert Dictionary and other online sources all say "le centre d'attention"
The de/de la/d'/du is always confusing.
In paragraph two of the transcript this sentence: 'Matisse rompt avec les règles...' is translated in the pop-up as 'Matisse broke the rules..' I assume this is a fixed construction? Is that exactly what it means or does it mean (as the French indicates with 'avec) that he broke with the accepted rules of the day. In English 'broke the rules' and 'broke with the rules' are not identical. I'm trying to find out if this is the case in French as well. Thanks.
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level