French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,014 questions • 32,554 answers • 1,025,302 learners
Thinking...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,014 questions • 32,554 answers • 1,025,302 learners
I'm confused by 'si vous pouviez ajouter' above which I'm not sure how to translate. I would have said 'si vous pourriez ajouter': 'if you would/could add'
In the lesson re the Cyclades, I left off des and was marked wrong. In the lesson notes, it states that using de after se rappeler is optional. It’s required if one uses se souvenir. So what is correct? Thanks.
'By the time my father succeeded' is translated as 'le temps que mon père réussisse'.
Could it also be 'le temps que mon père ait réussi'?
If so, are there stylistic considerations why you should chose one rather than the other?
During the exercise, the correct phrase was given as "toutes informations supplémentaires", but in the post-test summary it was "toute information supplémentaire". I think the plural form is correct. Am I right?
Could I also use 'prudent' instead of 'vigilant'?
In the last sentence, I used "Elle est" but was corrected to "C'est" and referred to the lesson for using c'est vs. elle/il est when saying "it is." I was confused by this, however, because I wasn't trying to say "it is" -- I was trying to say "she is," referring to Marc's daughter. What is the reason for the last sentence using "C'est"?
Hello: Would the translation be the same for the above? I have looked through the discussion and am still not sure.
Merci!
Regina
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level