French language Q&A Forum

Of this one "pour pouvoir te faire"?

Bonjour,

Is this sentence correct: je ne cours pas du tout pour faire du sport? When to add the pour+infinitif? Example, when you add pour in the example above: Pauline ne veut pas du tout pour dormir -> will mean the same thing as without pour, won't it?

Appreciate all the help! 

Merci :)

Arrived here from a Kwiz and given a choice of même and pareille.. i choose la pareille.. which it said was wrong and directed me here for an explanation.. not seeing pareille and any explanation as to why I was wrong?

a. Elle a invité ses amis pour regarder le film indien.

b. Je ne vais pas acheter cette voiture.

c. Lis ce livre !

d. Elle vient de prendre la viande.

e. Il aime moi et toi.

I think this should be "L'énergie qui se dégage du terrain est électrisante."

According to Larousse/Robert/Collins (and wordreference), there are 2 verbs for the English 'electrify':

Figurative use (charged atmosphere, give an electric shock to etc)- électriser, with the adjective 'électrisant(e)'

Physical use (provide electricity supply etc) - électrifier, with the adjective 'électrifiant(e)'

can impersonal expressions like il est possible que, il est certain que etc become c'est possible , c'est certain que etc. C'est seems more logical here than il.

Did anyone else have trouble understanding this sentence?

Which one is correct ( pour que tu pars or pour que tu partes ?) just as it is nothing else surrounding those 4 words.

Thank you 

I am struggling to understand when to use c’est rather than il/elle est despite having read through the suggested lesson. Can someone please help? 

As an alternative to 'il y a environ deux semaines' could you equally say 'il y a deux semaines environ' ?