French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,130 questions • 30,612 answers • 896,038 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
14,130 questions • 30,612 answers • 896,038 learners
Am struggling to understand why the answer uses the present subjunctive of etre.
Thanks for any help!
the answer "Non, vraiment, ça ne me plaît pas du tout !"
should it not be "Non, vraiment, ça ne me plais pas du tout !"
?
Less commonly, à + indirect object may be replaced with the adverbial pronoun y:
Il y pense. He’s thinking about her. J’y fais référence. I’m referring to them. On s’y habitue. We’re getting used to him.Found these here : https://www.lawlessfrench.com/grammar/indirect-objects-2/ So y seems to be able to replace people?Could you say "jusqu'à ce que j'aie trouvé la personne" instead of "jusqu'à ce que je trouve la personne"?
Hi, in the mini-quiz, it gives une histoire très interessante as correct. However, I understood that if the adjective is modified by an adverb of only one syllable, it comes before the verb. As in the given example un très joli manteau. So by that logic, it should be une très interessante histoire?
La video ne marche pas. La video est bloquee.
Would it be appropriate to use "génial" as a translation of "nice!"?
Also, why cannot 'le temps' be used to say "now it's time to..." ? The correct answer was l'heure.
The answer “et j’ai toujours été très romantique”. Could you explain why this isn’t in the imparfait tense? “j’étais toujours…. ?
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level