French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,057 questions • 32,708 answers • 1,039,629 learners
I'll be right with you...
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
15,057 questions • 32,708 answers • 1,039,629 learners
Why prèsent is used after pendant que why not futur as per lesson we should use futur after pendant que and quand
I can say, "I am bringing two bottles of wine there" I believe like this:
J'y apporte deux bouteilles de vin.
Can I say, "I am bringing two of them there" like this?
J'y en apporte deux.
Or would it be:
J'en y apporte deux.
Or would you use a completely different construction?
thanks, Scott
Bonjour,
Shouldn't the phrase "meme si je sais que c'est le repas le plus important de la journee" be "meme si je sais qu'il est le repas le plus important de la journee" because we are referring to something specific? (breakfast)
Merci.
These sentences are so similar that I don't understand why one uses "avoir" and the the other "etre." Don't they both have a direct object? "He walked down (the boulevard)", and "she went up (the hill)". I'm missing something!
Il ________ descendu le boulevard St Michel.
Elle ______ montee la colline.
Il a descendu ... but where is the verb meaning to walk? I would have translated this sentence as: Il a marché descendre ... I left the question blank because it was confusing. Thanks for your help!
Why is ‘ne soyez’ marked correct. Isn’t this subjonctif passé and isn’t fatiguer conjugated with avoir in compound tensed?
"J’ai commencé par laver et changer les draps, ce qui n’est pas une partie de plaisir toute seule"
I don't understand "toute seule" here. It appears to be behaving as an adjective, not an adverb.
If it is an adjective, what is it supposed to be agreeing with ?
Find your French level for FREE
And get your personalised Study Plan to improve it
Find your French level